What Are the Rights of Out-of-State Heirs in West Virginia Probate?

The passing of a loved one brings a wave of emotional challenges, often followed immediately by legal and logistical hurdles. When you live in another state but stand to inherit property or assets in West Virginia, those hurdles can seem even higher. Distance creates uncertainty. You might worry that living hundreds of miles away puts you at a disadvantage or that critical decisions regarding the estate will be made without your knowledge or consent.

Fortunately, geography does not diminish your legal standing. Whether you reside in Charleston, West Virginia, or Charleston, South Carolina, your rights as an heir are protected by the same state statutes. However, the practical reality of exercising those rights from afar requires a clear roadmap and, often, a higher degree of vigilance.

Do Out-of-State Heirs Have the Same Rights as Residents?

A common concern for non-resident beneficiaries is the fear of being treated as “second-class” citizens by the probate court. This is a misconception. West Virginia law does not discriminate against heirs based on their residency. If you are named in a valid will, or if you inherit through intestate succession (when there is no will), your entitlement to assets is identical to that of a beneficiary living next door to the county courthouse.

Fundamental Rights of Every Heir:

  • Right to Notification: You must be informed that the probate process has been initiated.
  • Right to an Inventory: You are entitled to review a comprehensive list of assets existing in the estate.
  • Right to Object: You have the legal standing to challenge the validity of the will or the competency of the executor.
  • Right to Accounting: You can demand to see a detailed ledger of how estate funds are being spent or distributed.
  • Right to Distribution: You are entitled to your specific share of the remaining assets after all valid debts and taxes are paid.

While your legal standing remains equal, your practical experience may differ. You cannot easily drive past the family home to check its condition or walk into the County Clerk’s office to review the physical file. This makes your right to information—and your ability to demand transparency—your most valuable tool.

Notification: How Will You Know Probate Has Started?

The probate process officially commences when an executor (named in the will) or an administrator (appointed by the court) “qualifies” at the County Commission in the county where the deceased resided. For out-of-state heirs, the first formal signal of this process is typically the “Notice of Administration.”

West Virginia law generally requires the personal representative to file a list of heirs and beneficiaries with the court. The Clerk of the County Commission then publishes a notice in a local newspaper. While this satisfies the basic legal requirement for public notice, a diligent and responsible executor should also contact known beneficiaries directly to inform them of the proceedings.

What if you haven’t received notice?

If you are aware that a loved one has passed away and believes an estate should be opened, but you have not received any communication, do not wait for a letter to arrive. You can proactively contact the County Clerk’s office in the county where your relative lived. Probate records are generally public, and you have the right to confirm if a file has been opened and identify who has been appointed to manage the estate.

The Role of the Non-Resident Executor vs. Heir

It is important to distinguish between the role of an heir (someone receiving assets) and an executor (someone responsible for managing the estate). You can hold both roles, or neither, and still be significantly involved in the process.

Can an Out-of-State Heir Also Be the Executor?

Yes. If your parent or relative named you as the executor in their will, you are permitted to serve in that capacity even if you live across the country. However, West Virginia places an additional safeguard on non-resident executors: the corporate surety bond.

 

Even if the will explicitly states, “My executor shall serve without bond,” the County Commission will almost always require a non-resident executor to purchase a bond from an insurance company. This bond acts as an insurance policy protecting the estate’s value against potential mismanagement or theft. This requirement is a key distinction between resident and non-resident fiduciaries, specifically designed to protect the interests of other heirs—including you, if you are not the one managing the checkbook.

Protecting Real Estate from a Distance

For many out-of-state heirs, the most significant asset at stake is real property—often the family home or land in West Virginia. This is frequently where anxiety runs highest. Is the house being maintained? Are property taxes being paid? Is a family member living there rent-free without permission?

Your Rights Regarding Real Property:

  • Maintenance and Preservation: The executor has a fiduciary duty to preserve the value of estate assets. This includes maintaining homeowner’s insurance, paying utilities, and ensuring the property does not fall into disrepair.
  • Sale of Property: Unless the will grants specific power of sale to the executor, selling real estate often requires the consent of the heirs or a court order. Generally, you cannot be forced to sell your share without a proper legal process, such as a partition suit.
  • Occupancy and Rent: A sibling or another heir generally does not have the right to live in the inherited house rent-free during probate to the detriment of other beneficiaries. The executor should typically charge fair market rent, which goes back into the estate to be divided among all heirs.

If you suspect the property is being neglected, damaged, or used improperly, you have the right to petition the court to intervene and protect your interest.

Challenging the Will: The “Will Contest”

In some cases, an out-of-state heir may discover that a new will was created shortly before death, perhaps cutting them out of the inheritance or significantly reducing their share. If you suspect undue influence or a lack of mental capacity, you have the right to contest the will.

Common Grounds for Contesting a Will in West Virginia:

  • Lack of Testamentary Capacity: The deceased did not understand the nature of their assets or who their natural heirs were at the time of signing.
  • Undue Influence: A caregiver, friend, or relative exerted improper pressure or manipulation on the deceased to change their will.
  • Fraud or Forgery: The signature on the will is not genuine, or the deceased was misled about the document they were signing.
  • Improper Execution: The will was not signed or witnessed in accordance with strict West Virginia state laws.

Time Limits Are Critical

You have a limited window of opportunity to file a will contest. While the specific timeframe relates to when the final settlement is filed, it is far safer and more effective to act immediately upon discovering the issue. Delaying action can result in the permanent loss of your right to object.

The Right to an Inventory and Accounting

Transparency is the antidote to suspicion. One of your most powerful rights as an heir is the ability to see exactly what is in the estate and how it is being valued.

The Appraisement and Inventory

Within a specific period after qualifying, the executor must file a document known as the “Appraisement and Non-Probate Inventory.” This document lists all assets—bank accounts, real estate, vehicles, stocks—and their estimated value. As an heir, you can request a copy of this document from the County Clerk. If you believe assets are missing (for example, a valuable collection or a savings account you knew existed), you can formally question the accuracy of the inventory.

The Final Settlement

Before the estate can be closed and final checks distributed, the executor must file a Final Settlement. This is a detailed financial ledger showing:

  • Total assets received into the estate.
  • All debts, taxes, and administrative expenses paid out.
  • The proposed distribution amounts to each heir.

You have the absolute right to review this settlement. If you see questionable expenses—such as the executor paying themselves an exorbitant fee or using estate funds for personal travel—you can file an “exception” to the settlement. This legal objection halts the closing process until the Fiduciary Commissioner reviews the dispute.

How to Monitor Probate Without Traveling

You do not need to book a flight to West Virginia every time a document is filed. Modern probate administration allows for significant remote monitoring, provided you know the proper channels.

Actionable Steps for Remote Heirs:

  • Establish Communication: Early in the process, send a certified letter to the executor and the attorney for the estate (if one has been hired). Request to be copied on all filings and correspondence.
  • Contact the Fiduciary Supervisor: Each county has a Fiduciary Supervisor who oversees probate matters. They can inform you of the estate’s status and alert you if mandatory deadlines have been missed.
  • Hire Local Counsel: The most effective way to monitor an estate is to hire a West Virginia probate attorney to act as your local representative. They can pull records, attend hearings on your behalf, and interpret legal filings that might otherwise be confusing.

Debts and Creditor Claims: Will They Wipe Out Your Inheritance?

A frequent concern for heirs is whether the debts of the deceased will consume the entire inheritance. West Virginia law establishes a specific priority for paying debts to ensure fairness.

Priority of Payments

  • Costs of estate administration (court fees, attorney fees).
  • Funeral and burial expenses.
  • Federal taxes.
  • Medical expenses related to the last illness.
  • Other unsecured debts (credit cards, personal loans).

As an heir, you are not personally liable for your relative’s debts. Creditors cannot pursue your personal bank account to pay off the deceased’s obligations. However, these debts must be paid from the estate’s assets before you receive your share. If the executor distributes money to heirs before paying valid creditor claims, those heirs could be forced to return the funds.

Ancillary Probate: When Property Exists in Multiple States

If your loved one lived in another state but owned a vacation home, land, or mineral rights in West Virginia, you might encounter a process called “ancillary probate.”

What is Ancillary Probate?

This is a secondary probate proceeding required when a deceased person owns real estate in a state other than their primary residence. For example, if your father lived in Ohio but owned a hunting cabin in West Virginia, the primary probate happens in Ohio, but a smaller, separate proceeding must be opened in West Virginia to legally transfer the title of the cabin.

Rights in Ancillary Probate

Your rights in an ancillary proceeding are the same as in a standard probate case. The West Virginia court will strictly govern the assets located within its borders, ensuring that local taxes are paid and that the transfer of title complies with state property laws.

The Role of the Fiduciary Commissioner

In many West Virginia counties, complex estates or those involving disputes are referred to a Fiduciary Commissioner. This is a lawyer appointed by the County Commission to act essentially as a judge or referee for probate matters.

If you file a formal dispute regarding the inventory or the final settlement, the Fiduciary Commissioner will hold a hearing to review the evidence. As an out-of-state heir, you can often appear at these hearings via counsel or, in some cases, request to participate remotely. However, having a local attorney present is highly advisable to ensure your arguments are effectively presented and your rights are protected.

Your Vigilance Matters

Living in another state does not dilute your inheritance rights, but it does increase the need for proactive management. The West Virginia probate process is designed to be fair, but it relies on interested parties to speak up when procedures are not followed. If you are an out-of-state heir concerned about a West Virginia estate, or if you need assistance administering an estate from afar, do not leave your inheritance to chance. Contact Hewitt Law PLLC today. We can review your situation, explain your options, and help you navigate the process with confidence and peace of mind.

The Role of Mediation in Elder Law Disputes: Preserving Family Relationships

Elder law addresses the complex needs of a growing senior population, involving intricate decisions about long-term care, financial planning, and healthcare directives. Disputes in this field are particularly weighty as they affect deeply personal family matters and emotional connections. Unlike impersonal legal conflicts, elder law disagreements over care, inheritance, or exploitation can severely damage family bonds. Mediation offers a cooperative and respectful alternative to courtroom battles, aiming to resolve legal and financial issues while preserving treasured family relationships by fostering open communication and creative solutions.

Comprehending Elder Law Disputes and Their Familial Impact

Common Types of Elder Law Disputes

Elder law encompasses a broad spectrum of legal matters, and within each, the potential for disagreement exists. Being aware of these common areas can help families anticipate challenges and consider proactive solutions like mediation.

  • Guardianship and Conservatorship: Conflicts frequently arise over who should be appointed to make personal, healthcare, or financial decisions for an elder deemed incapacitated. Disagreements may also surface regarding how an existing guardian or conservator is fulfilling their duties.
  • Estate Planning and Inheritance Disagreements: These are perhaps the most widely known disputes, involving challenges to the validity of wills or trusts, differing interpretations of inheritance provisions, or concerns about undue influence on the elder during the estate planning process.
  • Healthcare Decision-Making and End-of-Life Care: Deeply personal and often emotionally charged, disagreements can occur among family members about medical treatments, life-sustaining measures, palliative care, or the interpretation of advance directives like living wills or healthcare powers of attorney.
  • Financial Exploitation and Abuse Allegations: Suspicions or accusations that a family member, caregiver, or another party is improperly using an elder’s funds or assets, or exerting undue influence for financial gain, can lead to severe family conflict.
  • Caregiving Arrangements and Responsibilities: As an elder’s need for care increases, disputes can arise over who will provide care, how it will be managed, how costs will be shared, and whether professional caregivers or specific facilities are appropriate.
  • Power of Attorney Disputes: Questions often emerge regarding the actions of an agent acting under a power of attorney, particularly if other family members feel the agent is not acting in the elder’s best interest, is exceeding their authority, or is failing to be transparent.

The Emotional and Relational Stakes

What sets elder law disputes apart is the profound emotional and relational context in which they occur. These are rarely simple disagreements about facts or figures; they are often intertwined with decades of family history, unspoken expectations, sibling rivalries, parental favoritism (perceived or real), grief over a loved one’s declining health, and anxieties about the future. Past hurts can resurface, and differing views on “what’s best” for an elder can be deeply felt and passionately defended. When such emotionally laden issues are forced into a traditional adversarial legal system, the process itself can become a new source of trauma, hardening positions, and making reconciliation exceedingly difficult.

Limitations of Traditional Litigation

While litigation is a necessary component of our justice system, its adversarial nature presents significant drawbacks when applied to many elder law family disputes:

  • Exacerbates Conflict: The structure of litigation—pitting one side against another—often intensifies animosity and entrenches opposing viewpoints, making future cooperation nearly impossible.
  • Costly and Time-Consuming: Legal battles can drain family finances and drag on for months, sometimes years, prolonging uncertainty and stress. The financial resources spent on litigation could often be better used for the elder’s care or family well-being.
  • Results in Win/Lose Outcomes: Court decisions typically favor one side over the other. This can leave some family members feeling unheard, resentful, or unfairly treated, even if the outcome is legally “correct.”
  • Damages or Destroys Family Relationships: The public nature of court proceedings, the accusations made, and the overall adversarial experience can inflict irreparable harm on family bonds, leading to estrangement that lasts a lifetime. Sensitive family matters become part of the public record.

The Principles and Process of Mediation

What is Mediation?

Mediation is a flexible and confidential method of dispute resolution where an impartial third party, the mediator, assists disputing parties in negotiating a mutually acceptable agreement. Unlike a judge or arbitrator, the mediator does not make decisions for the parties. Instead, the mediator facilitates communication, helps identify and clarify issues, explores underlying interests, and guides the parties toward their own voluntary solutions. It is a process rooted in dialogue and cooperation rather than conflict and confrontation.

Core Principles of Mediation

Several core principles underpin the mediation process, ensuring its integrity and effectiveness, particularly in sensitive elder law matters:

  • Voluntariness: Parties generally choose to participate in mediation. While courts can sometimes order mediation, the decision to settle and the terms of any agreement remain with the parties themselves. This voluntary aspect fosters a greater commitment to the process and its outcomes.
  • Confidentiality: Mediation discussions and any documents prepared for mediation are typically confidential. This privacy encourages parties to speak openly and honestly without fear that their words will be used against them later if the mediation does not result in a full settlement. This is vital when discussing sensitive family information.
  • Neutrality of the Mediator: The mediator must be impartial, favoring no particular party or outcome. Their role is to manage the process fairly and help all participants have their voices heard, ensuring a level playing field for discussions.
  • Party Self-Determination: This is a cornerstone of mediation. The parties, not the mediator, retain control over the decision to settle and the specific terms of any agreement. The mediator facilitates; the parties decide. This empowerment often leads to more durable and satisfying solutions.

The Mediation Process in Elder Law

While adaptable to specific circumstances, the mediation process in elder law generally follows a series of steps designed to guide families from conflict to resolution:

Initial Consultations/Intake: One or more family members, or their attorneys, may contact a mediator or mediation service. The mediator will typically have preliminary discussions to gather basic information about the dispute, identify the parties involved, and assess whether mediation is a suitable approach. Logistical details like scheduling and fees are also discussed.

Joint Sessions: This is where the core work of mediation happens.

  • The mediator begins by explaining the process, outlining ground rules for communication, and reiterating their neutral role.
  • Each participant is given an uninterrupted opportunity to share their perspective on the situation, their concerns, and what they hope to achieve.
  • The mediator then helps the group identify the key issues that need to be addressed and explores the underlying interests, needs, and priorities of each party. This often involves reframing issues to promote constructive dialogue.

Caucuses (Separate Meetings): At various points, the mediator may choose to meet privately with individual parties or subgroups. These separate meetings, or caucuses, allow participants to discuss sensitive information or concerns more candidly with the mediator. Caucuses can also be used by the mediator to explore potential settlement options or to help a party assess the strengths and weaknesses of their position without the direct presence of other parties.

Generating Options and Solutions: Once issues and interests are clear, the mediator facilitates a brainstorming process where participants generate a range of possible solutions. The emphasis is on creative problem-solving, looking for options that can meet the needs of multiple parties, including the elder.

Reaching Agreement: If and when the parties find common ground and agree on solutions, the mediator helps them articulate the terms of their agreement. This is often formalized in a written document, such as a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) or a Mediated Settlement Agreement. The parties are typically advised to have this document reviewed by their respective independent legal counsel.

Follow-Up (if applicable): In some cases, particularly those involving ongoing care or complex arrangements, the mediated agreement might include provisions for future review or follow-up mediation sessions to address any new issues that arise or to modify the agreement as circumstances change.

Advantages of Mediation in Elder Law: Beyond the Courtroom

Choosing mediation for elder law disputes offers numerous benefits that extend far beyond simply avoiding a court date. These advantages are particularly compelling when the preservation of family relationships is a high priority.

Preserving and Repairing Family Relationships

This is often the most significant advantage. Mediation provides a structured yet flexible environment for difficult conversations:

  • It facilitates open communication, helping family members to truly hear and acknowledge each other’s perspectives, even amidst disagreement.
  • By focusing on underlying interests (e.g., “Mom’s well-being and happiness”) rather than rigid positions (e.g., “Mom must live with me”), mediation opens pathways for mutual gain.
  • It allows for the crafting of “win-win” solutions that consider everyone’s needs and contributions, reducing the resentment that often flows from imposed court orders.
  • For families already strained, mediation can be a platform for airing grievances constructively, fostering empathy, and beginning the process of reconciliation and healing.

Tailored and Creative Solutions

Courts are often limited by statutory remedies and procedural rules. Mediation, however, allows families to develop highly customized agreements that reflect their unique circumstances, values, and the specific needs of the elder. Solutions can be far more nuanced and practical than a judge might be able to order, addressing not just legal and financial matters but also emotional well-being, communication protocols, and future planning.

Cost and Time Efficiency

Litigation is notoriously expensive and can drag on for months or even years. Mediation is generally a much faster process, often concluding in a matter of weeks or a few sessions. This efficiency translates into significantly lower costs, preserving family resources that can be better directed towards the elder’s care or other family needs.

Confidentiality and Privacy

Court proceedings are a matter of public record. Mediation, conversely, is a confidential process. This privacy is paramount when dealing with sensitive family information, personal financial details, or health conditions. Keeping these matters private protects the dignity of the elder and allows family members to discuss issues more freely and honestly.

Empowerment and Control

In litigation, a judge or jury makes the final decision. In mediation, the parties themselves retain control over the outcome. This self-determination empowers participants, giving them ownership of the solutions. Agreements reached voluntarily are also more likely to be adhered to in the long run.

Reduced Stress and Emotional Strain

The adversarial nature of litigation is inherently stressful. Mediation offers a less formal, more supportive environment designed to reduce conflict and emotional distress. A skilled mediator helps manage difficult conversations and maintain a respectful atmosphere, making the process of resolving disputes less taxing on everyone involved.

When is Mediation Most Effective in Elder Law? (And When It May Not Be)

Mediation is a powerful tool, but its effectiveness can depend on the specific circumstances of the dispute and the willingness of the parties involved.

Ideal Scenarios for Mediation

Mediation tends to be most successful in elder law when there is:

  • Willing Participation: All essential parties are willing to participate in the process in good faith, with a genuine desire to find a resolution.
  • Commitment to Relationship Preservation: The desire to maintain or repair family relationships is a significant motivator for the participants.
  • Complex Emotional Issues: The dispute involves intricate family dynamics, emotional sensitivities, or communication breakdowns where a facilitated dialogue can be beneficial.
  • Need for Creative Solutions: The situation calls for flexible, customized solutions that a court might not be able to provide, such as detailed care plans or unique property distribution arrangements.
  • Specific Disputes: Common examples include disagreements over care arrangements for an aging parent, disputes involving family businesses where ongoing relationships are essential, or inheritance divisions where preserving family harmony is paramount. Ongoing communication is needed to manage an elder’s care.

Situations Where Mediation May Be Challenging or Inappropriate

While versatile, mediation is not a panacea for every elder law conflict. Certain situations may make it less suitable or require significant caution:

  • Significant Power Imbalances: If there is a history of abuse, coercion, intimidation, or a severe, unmanageable power imbalance between parties, mediation may not provide a safe or fair forum unless these issues can be effectively addressed by the mediator.
  • Cognitive Impairment: If a key party, particularly the elder, has undiagnosed or unmanaged severe cognitive impairment that prevents them from meaningfully participating or giving informed consent, mediation may be problematic. Accommodations or legal representation might be necessary.
  • Criminal Activity or Severe Exploitation: Situations involving clear criminal activity (e.g., proven theft or severe physical abuse) may require immediate legal intervention and protection through law enforcement or adult protective services, rather than, or before, mediation.
  • Unwillingness to Negotiate: If one or more essential parties are completely unwilling to negotiate, compromise, or participate genuinely, mediation is unlikely to succeed.
  • Need for Legal Precedent: If the primary goal is to obtain a definitive legal ruling on a point of law or to establish a legal precedent (e.g., interpreting a complex statute that will affect many others), litigation might be more appropriate.

Even in challenging situations, a skilled mediator may be able to adapt the process or suggest safeguards. However, a careful assessment of suitability is always important.

The Role of the Elder Law Mediator

The effectiveness of elder law mediation heavily relies on the skills, knowledge, and approach of the mediator. This is not a passive role; it requires active and nuanced facilitation.

Specialized Knowledge and Skills

An effective elder law mediator typically possesses:

  • Grasp of Elder Law Principles: While not providing legal advice, a working knowledge of common elder law issues, terminology, and the types of disputes that arise is highly beneficial.
  • Acumen in Family Dynamics: A deep appreciation for intergenerational conflict, family systems, grief processes, and the emotional complexities inherent in these disputes.
  • Strong Communication Abilities: Excellent active listening skills, the ability to reframe negative statements into constructive ones, and the capacity to clearly articulate issues and processes.
  • Empathy and Impartiality: The ability to connect with and show empathy for all parties while maintaining strict neutrality and impartiality.
  • Skill in Managing High Emotions: Techniques to de-escalate conflict, manage emotional outbursts, and create a safe space for difficult conversations.
  • Problem-Solving Facilitation: The ability to help parties move beyond entrenched positions, brainstorm creative options, and assess the feasibility of proposed solutions.

Guiding Principles for Elder Law Mediators

In addition to their skills, ethical and effective elder law mediators are often guided by principles such as:

  • Focus on the Elder’s Well-being: While remaining neutral between the disputing parties, the mediator is mindful that the elder’s best interests, safety, and dignity are central considerations.
  • Ensuring All Voices are Heard: Actively working to create an environment where all participants, including those who may be less assertive, feel empowered to express their views and concerns.
  • Promoting Respectful Communication: Establishing and maintaining ground rules that encourage respectful interaction, even when disagreements are profound.
  • Facilitating Exploration of Options: Helping parties to thoroughly explore all feasible options and the potential consequences of each before committing to an agreement.

Navigating the Mediation Process: Tips for Families

Successfully navigating elder mediation involves preparation, the right mindset, and active participation. Here are some tips for families embarking on this process:

Prepare for Mediation

Thoughtful preparation can significantly enhance the likelihood of a positive outcome:

  • Clarify Your Interests and Needs: Before the session, reflect on what is most important to you and what underlying needs you hope to address. Distinguish these from rigid positions.
  • Gather Relevant Documents: Collect any pertinent paperwork, such as financial records, medical reports, estate planning documents, or correspondence related to the dispute. Organize them for easy reference.
  • Consider Desired Outcomes: Think about what a good resolution would look like for you and for the family as a whole. Be open to various possibilities.

Choose the Right Mediator

The mediator plays a pivotal role. Look for someone with specific experience in elder law disputes and family mediation. Ensure all parties feel comfortable with the chosen mediator’s style and approach.

Come with an Open Mind

Enter the mediation process with a willingness to listen to others’ perspectives and to explore solutions you may not have previously considered. A rigid stance can hinder progress.

Focus on the Future

While it is often necessary to acknowledge past events and feelings, the primary aim of mediation is to find a constructive way forward. Try to concentrate on creating solutions that will work for the future, rather than dwelling solely on past grievances.

Be Patient

Resolving complex family disputes, especially those with a long history or deep emotional roots, takes time and effort. Be patient with the process and with the other participants. It may take more than one session to reach a comprehensive agreement.

Seek Independent Legal Advice

Mediators facilitate negotiation but do not provide legal advice to any party. It is highly recommended that participants consult with their own attorneys before, during, and especially before signing any mediated agreement. An attorney can help you perceive your rights, evaluate proposals, and ensure the final agreement protects your interests and is legally sound.

Mediation for Elder Law: A Kinder Path to Resolution and Lasting Family Relationships

The journey through elder law matters can be fraught with emotional and legal complexities. When disputes arise, the instinct might be to prepare for a fight, but such an approach often comes at the immense cost of damaged family relationships. At Hewitt Law PLLC, we believe in approaches that prioritize both legal soundness and relational well-being. If you are facing disagreements related to elder care, estate matters, or other sensitive family issues, exploring mediation could be the most valuable step you take. Contact us today to learn more about how mediation can help you preserve family relationships while resolving legal issues.

Fayetteville
204 N Court St.
Fayetteville, WV 25840
Phone: (304) 484-4889

South Charleston
4834 MacCorkle Ave
SW Suite 2
South Charleston, WV 25309